BBC NEWS | Europe | Arabs charged over Dutch cartoon

October 2nd, 2009 by admin

Arabs charged over Dutch cartoon

(source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8234359.stm)

An Arab organisation is to be put on trial in the Netherlands over its publication of a cartoon deemed offensive to Jews, prosecutors say.

The cartoon, published by the Arab European League (AEL) on its website, questions the Holocaust.

It said the decision to prosecute illustrated bias against Muslims.

It said the same standards were not applied to the Dutch MP Geert Wilders, who made a film including cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.

Last month prosecutors said they would not put the far-right MP on trial for distributing the controversial Danish cartoons, which caused a storm of protest after their publication in 2005.

Freedom of expression is only a pretext to make life bitter for Muslims

However, he is still being investigated separately for inciting hatred against Muslims by making statements comparing Islam to Nazism.

But Dutch prosecutors said the AEL cartoon was “discriminatory” and “offensive to Jews as a group… because it offends Jews on the basis of their race and/or religion”.

The Cartoon (not in orig. story)

The cartoon shows two men standing near a pile of bones at “Auswitch” (sic). One says “I don’t think they’re Jews”.

The other replies: “We have to get to the six million somehow.”

A spokeswoman for the prosecuting authority said the group could be fined up to 4,700 euros (£4,100), though in theory a prison sentence was also possible.

‘Perverse’

AEL chairman Abdoulmouthalib Bouzerda said the charges proved “what Muslims have been saying for decades”.

“Freedom of expression is only a pretext to make life bitter for Muslims… and if [they] try to bring this hypocrisy to light, that right is denied them.”

The AEL says it does not deny the facts of the Holocaust but posted the cartoon as an “act of civil disobedience”.

It said it had agreed to remove it from its site, but reversed that decision to protest over the failure to prosecute Geert Wilders.

“Double standards are being applied,” it said in a statement.

But Jewish groups said it was not reasonable for the group to express its opposition to alleged bias against Muslims, by attacking Jews.

Ronny Naftaniel of the Center for Documentation on Israel, said: “Imagine if Dutch Jews insulted Muslims every time they heard an anti-Semitic remark. What kind of perverse world would we be living in?”

Tensions over the Netherlands’ Muslim population have increased in recent years, notably since the killing of a controversial film-maker by a Muslim extremist in 2004.

via BBC NEWS | Europe | Arabs charged over Dutch cartoon.

Contact the Heretical Two

September 26th, 2009 by Juror02

Simon Sheppard
#A8042AA Wing B3-25
HMP Leeds
2 Gloucester Terrace
Stanningley Road, Leeds, LS12 2TJ
UNITED KINGDOM

Stephen Whittle
#A8041AA
Everthorpe Prison
Beck Road
Everthorpe
Brough
East Yorkshire
HU15 1RB
UNITED KINGDOM

These addresses are believed to be correct as of October 2009. For the latest information, go straight to the source: heretical.com.

Who Isn’t Talking About The Heretical Two?

September 26th, 2009 by Juror02

The American Civil Liberties Union: “The ACLU is our nation’s guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. These rights include your First Amendment rights – freedom of speech, association and assembly; freedom of the press, and freedom of religion.”  The Heretical Two were jailed for their web site, a web site originating in the United States of America.  “It is easy to defend freedom of speech when the message is something people find reasonable. The defense of freedom of speech is most critical when the message is one most people reject.” – from Why did the ACLU represent NAMBLA? Are you a member of the ACLU?  Ask them to support the Heretical Two.

ACLU Affiliates

Amnesty International: “‘Prisoners of conscience’ are men, women or children imprisoned solely for the peaceful expression of their beliefs or because of their race, gender or other personal characteristics. Many have never been charged with a crime. Amnesty seeks the immediate release of all prisoners of conscience.”  The Heretical Two were jailed for their web site, a web site that peacefully expressed their beliefs.  No evidence has been presented at any point that anyone who has accessed their web site has committed a criminal act as a result.  Are you a member of Amnesty International?  Ask them to support the Heretical Two.

Amnesty International USA
5 Penn Plaza
New York, NY 10001
telephone: +1-212-807-8400
fax: +1-212-627-1451
email: aimember@aiusa.org

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund: “A non-profit organization dedicated to the preservation of First Amendment rights for members of the comics community.”  The Heretical Two were jailed for the possession and publication of a comic book.  Are you a member of the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund?  Ask them to support the Heretical Two.

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund
271 Madison Avenue, Suite 1400
New York, NY 10016
telephone: +1-212-679-7151
e-mail: info@cbldf.org

The Electronic Frontier Foundation: “EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending your rights in the digital world.[...] When our freedoms in the networked world come under attack, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is the first line of defense. EFF broke new ground when it was founded in 1990 — well before the Internet was on most people’s radar — and continues to confront cutting-edge issues defending free speech, privacy, innovation, and consumer rights today. From the beginning, EFF has championed the public interest in every critical battle affecting digital rights.”  Are you a member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation?  Ask them to support the Heretical Two.

Electronic Frontier Foundation
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA
telehone: +1-415-436-9333
fax: +1-415-436-9993
email: information@eff.org

UK: Simon Singh – sued for criticizing Chiropractic

September 26th, 2009 by admin

Another UK case, currently in the courts, is the case of the scientist Simon Singh. This case has received much press and blog coverage, unlike the Heretical Two…

From Wikipedia:

On 19 April 2008, Singh wrote an article in the The Guardian, which resulted in him being sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association. When the case was first brought against him, The Guardian supported him and funded his legal advice, as well as offering to pay the BCA’s legal costs in an out-of-court settlement if Singh chose to settle. The suit is ongoing, with Singh stating that he will “contest the action vigorously… There is an important issue of freedom of speech at stake.”

The article developed the theme of the recently published book by Singh and Edzard Ernst, Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial, and made various statements about the usefulness of chiropractic “for such problems as ear infections and infant colic“:

“You might think that modern chiropractors restrict themselves to treating back problems, but in fact they still possess some quite wacky ideas. The fundamentalists argue that they can cure anything. And even the more moderate chiropractors have ideas above their station. The British Chiropractic Association claims that their members can help treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying, even though there is not a jot of evidence. This organisation is the respectable face of the chiropractic profession and yet it happily promotes bogus treatments.”

On Thursday 7 May 2009, a preliminary hearing took place at the Royal Courts of Justice in front of Mr Justice Eady. The judge held that merely using the phrase “happily promotes bogus treatments” meant that he was stating, as a matter of fact, that the British Chiropractic Association was being consciously dishonest in promoting chiropractic for treating the children’s ailments in question. Singh has denied he intended any such meaning and that such an interpretation makes it very difficult for him to fight his case in court as he had planned: “If we go to trial it’s almost impossible for me to defend the article, because it’s something I never meant in the first place.”

Singh’s campaign team announced via its Facebook group on 4 June 2009 that Singh had resolved to make an appeal against Mr Justice Eady’s ruling. This decision raises substantially the potential financial liability that Singh may face personally if he loses the case.

Some commentators have suggested this ruling could set a precedent to restrict freedom of speech to criticise alternative medicine.[15][16] An editorial in Nature commented on the case, and suggested that the BCA may be trying to suppress debate and that this use of British libel law is a burden on the right to freedom of expression, which is protected by the European Convention on Human Rights.[17]

The Wall Street Journal Europe has cited the case as an example of how British libel law “chills free speech”, commenting that:

“Mr. Singh is unlikely to be the last victim of Britain’s libel laws. Settling scientific and political disputes through lawsuits, though, runs counter the very principles that have made Western progress possible. ‘The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error,’ Bertolt Brecht wrote in The Life of Galileo… It is time British politicians restrain the law so that wisdom prevails in the land, and not errors.’… the U.S. Congress is considering a bill that would make British libel judgments unenforceable in the U.S.”

The charity Sense About Science has launched a campaign to draw attention to the case. They have issued a statement entitled “The English law of libel has no place in scientific disputes about evidence”, which has been signed by myriad individuals representing science, journalism, publishing, arts, humanities, entertainment, skeptics, campaign groups and law. As of July 27, 2009, over 15,000 have signed. Many press sources have covered the issue.

The publicity produced by the libel action has led to formal complaints of false advertising being made against more than 500 individual chiropractors within one 24 hour period, prompting the McTimoney Chiropractic Association to write to its members advising them to remove leaflets that make claims about whiplash and colic from their practice, to be wary of new patients and telephone inquiries, and telling their members: “If you have a website, take it down NOW.” and “Finally, we strongly suggest you do NOT discuss this with others, especially patients[.]“

For whatever good they do, if any, there is a petition online.
free debate

Glenn Beck on FCC Chairman

September 24th, 2009 by admin

FreeTheHereticalTwo.com is not a one-trick pony. Although as we’re building the site right now, it is a no-trick pony until a better basis of information is gathered and back-end configurations are made.

The scope of the site will be the destruction of freedom of speech and criminalization and persecution of unpopular opinion, and the two men in prison in England are the example of the control that the Western world is imposing on citizens who have committed no crime but that of thought and speech.

Statist assaults on freedom of speech continue.

Follow “Free The Heretical Two” on Twitter

September 23rd, 2009 by admin

We’re working on building the site now, subscribe to the twitter feed and get updates as we progress…

https://twitter.com/Heretical2Blog

References on the web…

September 22nd, 2009 by admin

In no order, just posting any site with any bit of information on the case to later draw from:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/Racehate-pair-flee-to-US.4291680.jp

http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5163

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2009/01/help-heretical-two.html

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2008/10/heretical-two-denied-bail.html

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/07/31/the-heretical-2-asylum-seekers-the-refugee-industry-won%E2%80%99t-be-fighting-for/

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/09/17/the-heretical-2-requests-for-asylum-and-letters-from-santa-ana-jail/

http://www.aaargh.codoh.com/blog/revieng/2009/07/29/heretical-two-win-the-first-round/

http://ask.metafilter.com/16724/What-is-Hereticalcom

http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/in_other_bizarre_british_freespeech_case

http://www.davidduke.com/general/hereticalcom-writers-persecuted-for-challenging-the-holocaust-story-in-britain_4140.html

http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/07/one-law-for-them.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Sheppard_%28activist%29

http://ovo127.com/2009/07/31/trevor-blake-the-heretical-two/

http://www.historykb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/british-history/5322/FREE-SPEECH-ON-TRIAL-The-Heretical-com-Two

http://www.davidduke.com/general/simon-sheppard-steve-whittle-seek-asylum-over-thought-offense-charges_4209.html

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/la_times_reports_whittle_and_sheppard_straight_and_true/

http://www.youtube.com/user/Heretical2

http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=1648

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1190841/Stephen-Whittle-Simon-Sheppard-race-hate-Britons-seeking-asylum-U-S–deported-judge-rejects-free-speech-plea.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqAkhXOeiSw (just text flying around and a few still images)

http://www.ety.com/HRP/heretics/zionistjihad.htm

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080718032201AAqLMkQ

http://hooverhog.typepad.com/hognotes/2009/03/sympathy-for-the-heretical-two-.html

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/08/07/Sheppard_asylum.html

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080807100657AANdmUS

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?s=101e24da2f7186a9d77f1146c3fa9458&t=66405

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=32138

http://ovo127.com/2009/09/22/trevor-blake-heretical-two-timeline/

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=618636

Archive.org

http://www.archive.org/details/TalesOfTheHolohoaxAJounalOfSatire – one of the items that they were prosecuted for.